The biggest energy policy to come out of Montpelier this year is hitting home in concrete ways for two Vermont mothers who showed up to the Statehouse on Monday.
Hannah Morgan lives in Plainfield with four kids between the ages of 10 months and five years, and she greeted lawmakers outside the entrance to the Statehouse to urge them to override Republican Gov. Phil Scott鈥檚 veto of a bill that's known as the "."
The legislation requires all Vermont utilities to source 100% of their energy from renewable sources by 2035. For Morgan, who has existential concerns about what climate change means for her children鈥檚 future, the proposal represents the sort of climate solution that generates hope.
鈥淎s a parent, for me, that鈥檚 the best thing I can do, because just wallowing in a pit of despair of how bad everything is is a lot worse than doing my little part,鈥� Morgan said Monday. 鈥淚 care about my own kids鈥� future, and I feel like it鈥檚 threatened by what we鈥檙e up against.鈥�
Climate change is bringing more-frequent and severe flooding to Vermont and average temperatures have risen by nearly 3掳F since the beginning of the 20th century.
Alison Despathy lives in Danville with three kids between the ages of 12 and 20, and she went to the Statehouse Monday because she鈥檚 worried about her children鈥檚 future, too. For Despathy, however, it鈥檚 the renewable energy standard, along with increases in taxes and fees, that pose the threat.
鈥淚 just feel that Vermonters need to be able to afford to live in Vermont,鈥� said Despathy, who has serious concerns about what the utility mandate will mean for electricity rates. 鈥淧eople are paying a lot more already, on top of massive inflation. So I think that鈥檚 where legitimately Vermonters have major concerns about, 鈥楢m I going to have enough money to live here and pay my bills, pay my taxes?鈥欌€�
Morgan and Despathy embody the tension that elected officials tried to navigate this year as they debated legislation that will determine the source of the electricity that Vermonters use to power their homes, businesses and, increasingly, their vehicles.
Democratic lawmakers overrode Scott鈥檚 veto of their renewable energy standard Monday, setting in motion a multi-year plan that not only requires utilities to have 100% renewable portfolios by 2035, but also mandates that more of that power come from in-state generation projects.
Dover Rep. Laura Sibilia, an Independent, said the measure will protect ratepayers from volatile spikes in fossil fuel costs while reducing the emissions that are contributing to climate change.
鈥淥ur bill is designed to address the unique needs of Vermont鈥檚 varied utilities and to enhance the resilience of our grid, particularly in rural areas,鈥� Sibilia said Monday.
In his , Scott said the renewable energy standard comes with a cost that many Vermonters cannot afford.
How much the bill will cost has been hotly debated.
The Legislature鈥檚 Joint Fiscal Office issued fiscal notes for the bill during the session. Ultimately, JFO estimates the bill would cost Vermonters between $150 million and $450 million by 2035, which the office predicts is the equivalent of adding between $4.50 and $13.50 to the average Vermont household鈥檚 monthly electric bill by the same year. The body has also stressed that a lot of uncertainty remains when it comes to estimating the cost of the bill.
Scott鈥檚 Department of Public Service presented lawmakers with an alternative plan that would also have decarbonized Vermont's grid, albeit more slowly, and with less of an emphasis on in-state generation of renewable energy.
Democratic lawmakers rejected that proposal, saying their plan is a grand bargain of sorts between utilities, environmental advocates and the energy industry.
Granby Rep. Terri Lynn Williams, a Republican who voted to sustain Scott鈥檚 veto on Monday, represents one of the lowest-income legislative districts in Vermont. She said she the renewable energy standard is a symptom of a Legislature that鈥檚 lost touch with working Vermonters.
鈥淲e can鈥檛 afford to live here anymore. Our children are leaving the state. Instead of helping us help ourselves, you are destroying our very existence,鈥� Williams told her colleagues Monday. 鈥淚 have reminded you several times, 鈥楲eave us alone. Stop putting these financial burdens on us, and we can survive.鈥� You are not listening. The Vermont we grew up in no longer exists.鈥�
Have questions, comments or tips? .
