¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý is independent, community-supported media, serving Vermont with trusted, relevant and essential information. We share stories that bring people together, from every corner of our region. New to ¿ªÔÆÌåÓý? Start here.

© 2025 ¿ªÔÆÌåÓý | 365 Troy Ave. Colchester, VT 05446

Public Files:
· · · ·
· · · ·
· · · ·
· ·

For assistance accessing our public files, please contact [email protected] or call 802-655-9451.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Contract talks sour in Rutland City schools

Nina Keck
/
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý File
Labor negotiations between teachers and the school board in Rutland City have soured after the board rejected an independent fact-finder's report.

Labor negotiations are souring in Rutland City schools, where the school board has just rejected the recommendations of an independent .

Board members argue the report was flawed � and unaffordable for taxpayers. The union says the district's teachers are among the lowest-paid in the region.

Union president Sue Tanen has been working in Rutland schools for nearly 20 years. The district is no stranger to difficult contract talks, she said, but the union has accepted the recommendations of fact-finders in the past � even when it didn’t like them.

“We accepted it all the times it wasn't exactly what we wanted it to be, and they're refusing to accept it � trying to make it seem like it's not valid. And it is,� Tanen said.

But Charlene Seward, who has been leading negotiations on behalf of the board, says the district is just doing its due diligence.

“We want to give the teachers as much as we possibly can, but at the same time, we have a fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers,� Seward said. “It's right that we look at the fact-finding report with our eyes wide open, go through all the facts that are in there, check it, make sure that it's sustainable.�

More from ¿ªÔÆÌåÓý: With shaky support, an education reform bill passes the House

Seward says that the board is planning to release additional details soon about its analysis of the report’s flaws. But the main problem, she said, is that the fact-finder underestimated the cost of his proposals.

Negotiations between the district and its 273 teachers have been ongoing since December 2023. The current contract expired July 1, when an impasse was declared. The two parties have already tried and failed mediation, and engaged a fact-finder in March.

Salaries and sick time have been the key points of contention. Where some districts gave their educators special time off when they needed to quarantine during the pandemic, educators in Rutland just blew through their sick time. And pay, Tanen said, doesn’t match what neighboring districts offer.

“We are one of the lowest-paid in the area. We lose people to other districts, and we need to fix that,� she said.

Rutland City teachers also receive a city pension in addition to the state’s pension, and board members argue the fact-finder did not adequately take this benefit into account.

“I’m not saying that we are at the top of the charts, but when you add our pension � we are close to the top,� Seward said.

More from ¿ªÔÆÌåÓý: Vermont's post-pandemic teacher shortage has gotten worse

There's a 30-day cooling off period after a fact-finder's report is issued where educators can't strike and management can't impose a contract. After that, Tanen says all options are on the table.

The last teachers strike in Vermont took place eight years ago, in Burlington.

Lola is ¿ªÔÆÌåÓý's education and youth reporter, covering schools, child care, the child protection system and anything that matters to kids and families. Email Lola.

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message.

Loading...


Latest Stories