A coalition of four wildlife advocacy groups 鈥� Protect Our Wildlife, Vermont Wildlife Coalition, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy 鈥� are suing Vermont's Department of Fish and Wildlife over new rules for trapping and for hunting coyotes with dogs.
In , filed in Washington County Superior Court, the advocates allege the new rules do not do what lawmakers asked for when they called for an update.
Among other concerns about trapping regulations, advocates say the department acted unlawfully by lifting a moratorium on hunting coyotes with hounds in Vermont on Jan. 1.
Brenna Galdenzi leads Protect Our Wildlife, one of the groups that sued.
"The moratorium on coyote hunting must remain in effect until Fish and Wildlife is able to provide a method of control of dogs that will in fact protect the public, our property, our domestic animals," Galdenzi says.
Last year, lawmakers called for a temporary ban until new regulations could be written.
But in the fall, the Legislative Committee that reviews new regulations told the Secretary of State the new regulations did not go far enough.
Lawmakers and advocates complained the rule does not require hunters to have adequate control of their hounds. And they say the restrictions on trapping are lukewarm compared with what was called for in statute. Additionally, they took issue with the board redefining trapping as a form of hunting.
"We believe that they're doing that to codify trapping as a form of hunting in order to provide trapping with greater constitutional protections," Galdenzi said.
At the time, the department's general counsel told lawmakers the move was about clarifying regulatory language.
In addition to echoing the concerns LCAR raised over the regulations, the wildlife advocates' suit argues that a 50-foot buffer for body gripping traps around some trails is not sufficient to protect domestic dogs.
The groups are also reiterating their call for those traps to be banned, and say Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife hasn't provided sufficient evidence that the new regulations improve animal welfare.
"A principal intent of Act 159 [which called for reforms to trapping regulations] was to protect the public and pets from traps near trails," said Rob Mullen, chair of the Vermont Wildlife Coalition. "The Department and Board made no serious effort to fulfill that goal of the law, so the public and pets, especially dogs, are still at risk."
Lawmakers on Vermont's that would take away the rulemaking authority of the Fish and Wildlife Board and ban indefinitely the hunting of coyotes with dogs. The bill would also ban the use of bait to hunt coyotes.
Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife declined to comment on the lawsuit, and directed inquiries to the Attorney General's Office, which is defending the department.
In a statement, Attorney General Charity Clark said her office received the advocates' lawsuit on Thursday, Jan. 18.
"We are still reviewing the complaint and will respond to the lawsuit and the court as appropriate," Clark said in a statement.
Have questions, comments or tips? or contact reporter Abagael Giles:
