A will move forward after a judge this month rejected an attempt to have it dismissed.
Filed by former Vermont Attorney General T.J. Donovan, the case alleges the companies violated the state鈥檚 Consumer Protection Act by knowingly misleading the public about their products鈥� role in climate change.
鈥淭his is a case 鈥� that reflects Vermont's values鈥� which is to allow Vermont consumers who care about the environment to make choices that reflect that value,鈥� said Vermont鈥檚 current Attorney General Charity Clark. 鈥淎nd if companies are not being honest about those elements in their product, then Vermonters are deprived of that opportunity.鈥�
Clark said she was very pleased with the court鈥檚 decision and looks forward to preparing for trial.
The companies named in the suit 鈥� Exxon Mobil Corporation, Shell Oil Company, Citgo and Sunoco among others 鈥� attempted to get the case dismissed, raising concerns about statute of limitations, Vermont鈥檚 jurisdiction to bring this kind of lawsuit and free speech among other claims.
In a ruling earlier this month, Vermont Superior Court Judge Megan Shafritz disagreed and said Vermont鈥檚 case has enough factual standing to move forward.
开云体育 reached out to ExxonMobil for comment but did not hear back.
The lawsuit has faced hurdles in the past.
It stalled after it was initially filed, as the companies fought to get it tried in federal court 鈥� a tactic commonly employed by industry to fight this kind of lawsuit.
Earlier this year, Vermont argued successfully that the case should be heard in state court, which is where it will now proceed.
Scientists broadly agree that burning fossil fuels is the leading cause of global warming, and Vermont鈥檚 lawsuit alleges fossil fuel companies鈥� own internal documents show they were aware of the risk their products posed decades ago.
Vermont is one of nationwide that have sued major oil and gas companies for allegedly misleading consumers. Consumer protection is one of several legal avenues states and cities are increasingly using to try to collect damages from fossil fuel companies to help pay for climate adaptation.
Jared Carter, a professor at Vermont Law and Graduate School who studies consumer protection, says Vermont鈥檚 law has particularly strong protections for consumers and this suit could be a promising avenue for the state to pursue damages for climate change.
He called this month鈥檚 ruling a significant moment in the case.
鈥淚t's certainly a win for the attorney general and a loss for the industry,鈥� Carter said. 鈥淭hey're going to have to go through discovery. The state is going to be able to ask them questions鈥� perhaps depose some of these people. So it's a tremendous win, I think, for the state of Vermont.鈥�
Both sides will now begin gathering evidence for a possible trial, though it鈥檚 still possible the case could be resolved through another venue and a trial date has not yet been set. Clark says it will likely be several years before the suit is resolved.
Have questions, comments or tips? .
